Sandeep, one question: should corporations get unlimited say in who wins? ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
| One Question — Takes One Moment |
Friend, I have one question — and I genuinely want your answer: should corporations be allowed to spend unlimited, anonymous money to influence who wins your elections? No disclosure. No limit. Just a check written in the dark, deciding what ad shows up in your feed and who ends up representing you — without you ever knowing who paid for it. Please answer only if you actually care about how political messaging gets funded, by whom, and how or whether it gets disclosed. If you aren't interested in policy issues like these or protecting Democracy, please don't answer as it alters our data and findings. |
|
|
No donation or registration required — just your honest answer. |
|
$1.9 billion in undisclosed "dark money" flowed into 2024 federal races — a record high, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. It's legal because of the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United ruling, which opened the door to unlimited independent political spending.
|
Thanks for weighing in — I mean that. This is exactly the kind of thing that gets buried unless enough of us say something.
Jack |
| P.S. — Just hit reply and type YES or NO. I read every one, and I want to know what you think. |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment